So, is there anyone left? /s

This is more common in FLOSS then in corporate/closed source projects.

I probably would. Or just go for the cheaper route of paying them monthly/yearly

The arr programs have 'plex watchlist' under the connect settings

I would recommend listarr as well. Woke up to "disclosure day" this morning without even asking.

> I chose to enable zram for swap

swap is used when you run out of ram. using a ramdisk for swap ... You see how that doesnt make sense?

It's more complicated than that, same as PAGING on Windows. It's about offloading some of the less accessed data from RAM onto slower hardware.

You can compress the swap, so you can squezze a bit more by using CPU in that tiny amount of read you do.

> swap is used when you run out of ram

This is not correct. Swap is not a RAM overflow.

> Swap is not generally about getting emergency memory, it's about making memory reclamation egalitarian and efficient. In fact, using it as "emergency memory" is generally actively harmful.

https://chrisdown.name/2018/01/02/in-defence-of-swap.html

Zram creates a compressed RAM disk. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Zram

It's also not the optimal choice in most situations: https://chrisdown.name/2026/03/24/zswap-vs-zram-when-to-use-...

The main point is to use zswap over swap plus zram. The sd card usecase definitely doesnt want swap to disk, compressed or otherwise, so zram or no swap are the options.

Moving swap off of sdcard is indeed a good plan. But since swapping is done when ram is depleted, using a ramdisk for it (which uses ram) is ... exactly what you dont want. Since OP states they have disks attached to the machine as well, the better thing is use a partition there for swap.

Exactly. The previous install of the system had no swap at all so enabling zram is an improvement.

spec-driven development is pretty good at this

> Vibe code was never meant to be reviewed.

It was also never meant to hit production.

There's a big difference between owning content, and having access to download content. The problem here is that you were not buying a version you could download and store on your system, and just play it back with whatever. So you 'bought' it while it was still under their control etc.

But like so many other comments here state: it's very much a known fact that 'buying' something like this is just renting it for a short time period. We must keep fighting for them to actually state this in bold text before you pay them.

In my opinion (which might not be shared by everyone) this is a you problem. Developers in the team not using decontainers should not have to worry about your environment. ide/local-env stuff should be ignored in the users git setup, everything that the repo creates (build artifacts, environment files etc) should be in the repo.

> Excluding harmful content

#define(HARMFUL)

[edit] Downvoters please tell me what the problem is with specifying this?

I didn't down vote you, but you aren't really adding anything to the conversation. This type of pithy comment might be fun on Reddit, but at HN, we try to provide more constructive, and information rich, comments.