Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But we already embraced this way of thinking since introduction of „corporate personhood”.


One can disagree about aspects of corporate financing of elections etc. while also accepting that everything doesn't get thrown up in the air if a corporate officer leaves for another company. Corporations are established entities that effectively act as a person for certain purposes--though one is welcome to disagree about the extent of those purposes. I expect most people here wouldn't, for example, be opposed to corporations donating to open source projects or other charitable causes.


There is a world of difference between supporting open source software or any pro bono foundation

and

supporting election candidacy.

I think a 2yo will get the distinction and you are asking for clarification?

Besides that go read up on 80’s literature on corporations. Like Gibson or Stephenson.


This is a strawman. Why do you have to be a person to donate to charities?


Corporations donate to 501(c)3s as entities and even have matching gifts. In fact, a lot of charities have corporations/foundations as some of their largest contributors.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: